DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 1    
---------------------- 25%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  6,568.0  (62.0%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Richard WALLS  1,677.0  (15.8%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGG ________ :
Lee VANDERVIS  965.0  (9.1%) 
FFFFFFFF ______________ :
Fliss BUTCHER  766.0  (7.2%) 
BBBBBB ________________ :
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR  278.0  (2.6%) 
DDD ___________________ :
Diane YELDON  179.0  (1.7%) 
H _____________________ :
Mark PETERS  161.0  (1.5%) 
E _____________________ :
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Peter Wing Ho CHIN Elected
BBBBB DDD EE FFFFFFF GGGGGGGGGGGGGGG H

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (25% of counted votes).

In the first round, the first choices on each ballot are tallied.
Peter Wing Ho CHIN has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.

next round Next Round














 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 2    
----------------------- 25%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  2,648.5  (25.0%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
Richard WALLS  3,407.7  (32.2%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :GGGGGG
Lee VANDERVIS  1,799.7  (17.0%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ________ :
Fliss BUTCHER  1,393.2  (13.2%) 
BBBBBBBBBBBB ___________ :
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR  644.5  (6.1%) 
DDDDDD _________________ :
Diane YELDON  322.5  (3.0%) 
HHH ____________________ :
Mark PETERS  377.9  (3.6%) 
EEE ____________________ :
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Richard WALLS Elected
BB D E FF

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (25% of counted votes).

Richard WALLS has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.

next round Next Round














 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 3    
---------------------- 25%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  2,648.5  (25.0%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
Richard WALLS  2,648.5  (25.0%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
Lee VANDERVIS  2,051.6  (19.4%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF _____ :
Fliss BUTCHER  1,610.2  (15.2%) 
BBBBBBBBBBBBB _________ :
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR  767.1  (7.2%) 
DDDDDD ________________ :
Diane YELDON  388.3  (3.7%) 
HHH ___________________ :
Mark PETERS  479.9  (4.5%) 
EEEE __________________ :
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Diane YELDON Defeated
B C E F

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (25% of counted votes).

No new candidate has the number of votes needed to guarantee victory, so the last-place candidate (Diane YELDON) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.

New colors:
I
None of these

next round Next Round














 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 4    
---------------------- 25%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  2,744.4  (25.9%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :C
Richard WALLS  2,651.5  (25.1%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
Lee VANDERVIS  2,133.3  (20.2%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ____ :
Fliss BUTCHER  1,717.2  (16.2%) 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB _______ :
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR  809.7  (7.7%) 
DDDDDDD _______________ :
Mark PETERS  525.9  (5.0%) 
EEEE __________________ :
None of these  12.0   
______________________
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Mark PETERS Defeated
B CC D F

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (25% of counted votes).

No new candidate has the number of votes needed to guarantee victory, so the last-place candidate (Mark PETERS) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.

next round Next Round














 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 5    
----------------------- 25%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  2,958.3  (28.0%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :CC
Richard WALLS  2,665.5  (25.2%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
Lee VANDERVIS  2,224.2  (21.1%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF _____ :
Fliss BUTCHER  1,821.2  (17.2%) 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ________ :
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR  895.8  (8.5%) 
DDDDDDD ________________ :
None of these  29.0   
I ______________________
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR Defeated
BB CCC FF I

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (25% of counted votes).

No new candidate has the number of votes needed to guarantee victory, so the last-place candidate (Phillip DE WATTIGNAR) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.

next round Next Round














 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 6    
---------------------- 25%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  3,301.4  (31.4%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :CCCCC
Richard WALLS  2,700.5  (25.6%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
Lee VANDERVIS  2,446.1  (23.2%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF __ :
Fliss BUTCHER  2,082.1  (19.8%) 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ____ :
None of these  64.0   
______________________
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Fliss BUTCHER Defeated
CCCCCCCC FFFFFF G II

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (25% of counted votes).

No new candidate has the number of votes needed to guarantee victory, so the last-place candidate (Fliss BUTCHER) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.

next round Next Round














 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 7    
----------------------------- 33.3%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  4,272.5  (41.3%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :CCCCCCC
Richard WALLS  2,807.5  (27.2%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG _____ :
Lee VANDERVIS  3,255.0  (31.5%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF __ :
None of these  259.0   
II ___________________________
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Peter Wing Ho CHIN Equalized
FF GGGGG

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents an elected member's equal share of the votes (33.3% of counted votes).

At this point, the number of remaining candidates equals the number of remaining seats, so the remaining candidates are declared elected.

Transfers are made from each winner until they all have an equal share of the votes.

next round Next Round














 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 8    
---------------------------- 33.3%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  3,445.0  (33.3%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
Richard WALLS  3,429.9  (33.2%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
Lee VANDERVIS  3,460.1  (33.5%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :F
None of these  259.0   
III _________________________
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Lee VANDERVIS Equalized

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents an elected member's equal share of the votes (33.3% of counted votes).

At this point, the number of remaining candidates equals the number of remaining seats, so the remaining candidates are declared elected.

Transfers are made from each winner until they all have an equal share of the votes.

next round Next Round














 
  
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 9    
----------------------------- 33.3%
Peter Wing Ho CHIN  3,445.0  (33.3%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
Richard WALLS  3,445.0  (33.3%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
Lee VANDERVIS  3,445.0  (33.3%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :
None of these  259.0   
III __________________________
   
Results  
Peter Wing Ho CHINElected 
Lee VANDERVISElected 
Richard WALLSElected 

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents an elected member's equal share of the votes (33.3% of counted votes).

At this point, the number of remaining candidates equals the number of remaining seats, so the remaining candidates are declared elected.
In the end, 97.6% of all cast ballots counted toward a winner. This compares to 86.9% if only the first-round votes were used. You should be able to see that the winners have a more equal mandate in the final round than in the first round.

Note that even the "highest first-round votes" method is more democratic than most methods used in US public elections: the "vote for 3" method, which allows the largest block of voters to dominate, and the district method, where choices are restricted to the one or two viable candidates within geographical boundaries drawn by the politicians in office.

The Ballot Depth section shows how much lower rankings contributed to the tally.
















 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew
by DemoChoice rules
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Final Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Ballot Depth: This shows how much the lower rankings on ballots contributed to the winning candidates.

Rank Fraction of votes for winners
1st 55.9% 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
2nd 28.7% 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
3rd 10.4% 
XXXXXXXXXX
4th 2.1% 
XX