DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 1  Votes 
-------------------------------------- 2671 13/84 (14.3%)--------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     3842   (20.5%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1
Fantini, Alfred B.     2905   (15.5%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :CCC
1
McGovern, Marc C.     2716   (14.5%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :G
1
Lummis, Ben     2604   (13.9%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF:
1
Harding, Richard, Jr.     2362   (12.6%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE____:
1
Grassi, Joseph G.     2295   (12.3%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD______:
1
Price, Alan C.     1301   (7.0%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH____________________:
1
Craig, Christopher     573   (3.1%) 
BBBBBBBB______________________________:
1
Write-in 1     95   (0.5%) 
AA____________________________________:
1
Write-in 2     3   (0.0%) 
J_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 3     2   (0.0%) 
K_____________________________________:
1
       
Results     
Fantini, Alfred B. Elected  
McGovern, Marc C. Elected  
Walser, Nancy Elected  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
A B DDD EEEE FFFF GG HHHH J
 
Transfers (from these colors):  
CC IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
 
       
Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots  
Fantini, Alfred B. 23371/84 76/84
1: 2380
 
McGovern, Marc C. 4471/84 83/84
1: 2303
 
Walser, Nancy 117071/84 53/84
1: 3076
 

Each ballot initially counts toward its highest-ranked eligible choice. However, in future rounds, a maximum fraction of a ballot may be imposed on a candidate. This allows voters for popular winners (or for eliminated losers) to help unelected candidates or candidates elected later. If there are no such candidates, the leftover fraction goes back to the first winner, or count toward "none of these" if there are no ranked winners.

The ballot fraction precision is equal to 1/Seats(Seats+1), which ensures that winners can always be kept between Enough votes to win, more than (Total Votes for Candidates)/(Seats+1), and the Ideal Number of votes, (Total Votes for Candidates)/Seats.
If all winners have at least "Enough" votes, it is impossible to elect too many candidates. This number is Ballots/(Seats+1) plus the smallest fraction.
If all winners have exactly the Ideal Number of votes, and they each have an equal voice, everyone who voted for a winner is equally represented.
The dotted line on the graph represents Enough votes.
The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 2  Votes 
-------------------------------------- 2671 13/84 (14.3%)--------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     273264/84  (14.6%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :I
53/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     279142/84  (14.9%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :CC
76/84
McGovern, Marc C.     285742/84  (15.3%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :GGG
83/84
Lummis, Ben     285714/84  (15.3%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :FFF
1
Harding, Richard, Jr.     26021/84  (13.9%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE_:
1
Grassi, Joseph G.     251426/84  (13.4%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD__:
1
Price, Alan C.     15939/84  (8.5%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH________________:
1
Craig, Christopher     64668/84  (3.5%) 
BBBBBBBBBB____________________________:
1
Write-in 1     9769/84  (0.5%) 
A_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 2     31/84  (0.0%) 
J_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 3     2   (0.0%) 
K_____________________________________:
1
       
Results     
Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized  
Lummis, Ben Elected  
McGovern, Marc C. Equalized  
Walser, Nancy Equalized  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
A B DD E H I J
 
Transfers (from these colors):  
CC FF GG
 
       
Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots  
Fantini, Alfred B. 12029/84 71/84
76/84: 2380 31/84: 253 1/84: 191
 
Lummis, Ben 1861/84 75/84
1: 2252 31/84: 468 8/84: 102 1/84: 614
 
McGovern, Marc C. 18629/84 74/84
83/84: 2303 31/84: 318 8/84: 155
 
Walser, Nancy 6151/84 50/84
53/84: 3076 8/84: 165 1/84: 354
 

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 3  Votes 
-------------------------------------- 2671 13/84 (14.3%)--------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     274054/84  (14.7%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :I
50/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     269934/84  (14.4%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
71/84
McGovern, Marc C.     271722/84  (14.5%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :G
74/84
Lummis, Ben     27255/84  (14.6%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :F
75/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     269178/84  (14.4%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :
1
Grassi, Joseph G.     263118/84  (14.1%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD:
1
Price, Alan C.     169633/84  (9.1%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH______________:
1
Craig, Christopher     6923/84  (3.7%) 
BBBBBBBBBB____________________________:
1
Write-in 1     9879/84  (0.5%) 
A_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 2     310/84  (0.0%) 
J_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 3     2   (0.0%) 
K_____________________________________:
1
       
Results     
Harding, Richard, Jr. Elected  
Lummis, Ben Equalized  
McGovern, Marc C. Equalized  
Walser, Nancy Equalized  
Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
A B C D H J
 
Transfers (from these colors):  
E F G I
 
       
Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots  
Harding, Richard, Jr. 2065/84 82/84
1: 1805 34/84: 509 13/84: 176 10/84: 238 9/84: 217
 
Lummis, Ben 5376/84 72/84
75/84: 2252 34/84: 468 13/84: 102 10/84: 614
 
McGovern, Marc C. 469/84 71/84
74/84: 2303 34/84: 318 13/84: 155 9/84: 637
 
Walser, Nancy 6941/84 47/84
50/84: 3076 13/84: 165 10/84: 354 9/84: 356
 
Fantini, Alfred B. 2821/84 70/84
71/84: 2380 35/84: 253 11/84: 287
 

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 4  Votes 
-------------------------------------- 2671 13/84 (14.3%)--------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     267536/84  (14.3%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :
47/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     270030/84  (14.4%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
70/84
McGovern, Marc C.     268334/84  (14.4%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :G
71/84
Lummis, Ben     269970/84  (14.4%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :F
72/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     269115/84  (14.4%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :E
82/84
Grassi, Joseph G.     267252/84  (14.3%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD :
1
Price, Alan C.     175849/84  (9.4%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH____________:
1
Craig, Christopher     71174/84  (3.8%) 
BBBBBBBBBB____________________________:
1
Write-in 1     9947/84  (0.5%) 
A_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 2     313/84  (0.0%) 
J_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 3     2   (0.0%) 
K_____________________________________:
1
       
Results     
Grassi, Joseph G. Elected  
       
Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots  
Grassi, Joseph G. 139/84 1
1: 1787 37/84: 179 14/84: 932 13/84: 111 12/84: 71 2/84: 285
 

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

There is a newly elected candidate whose maximum could not be reduced. The surplus is lower than the number of ballots in the first histogram bin (the ballots counting the largest fraction toward the candidate) times the smallest fraction, so they cannot all transfer that fraction without exceeding the surplus.
Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 5  Votes 
-------------------------------------- 2671 13/84 (14.3%)--------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     267536/84  (14.3%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :
47/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     270030/84  (14.4%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
70/84
McGovern, Marc C.     268334/84  (14.4%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :G
71/84
Lummis, Ben     269970/84  (14.4%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :F
72/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     269115/84  (14.4%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :E
82/84
Grassi, Joseph G.     267252/84  (14.3%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD :
1
Price, Alan C.     175849/84  (9.4%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH_____________:
1
Craig, Christopher     71174/84  (3.8%) 
BBBBBBBBBB____________________________:
1
Write-in 1     9947/84  (0.5%) 
A_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 2     313/84  (0.0%) 
J_____________________________________:
1
Write-in 3     2   (0.0%) 
K_____________________________________:
1
       
Results     
Write-in 3 Defeated  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
L
 
       

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 6  Votes 
--------------------------------------- 2670 73/84 (14.3%)---------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     267536/84  (14.3%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :
47/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     270030/84  (14.4%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
70/84
McGovern, Marc C.     268334/84  (14.4%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
71/84
Lummis, Ben     269970/84  (14.4%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :
72/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     269115/84  (14.4%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :
82/84
Grassi, Joseph G.     267252/84  (14.3%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD :
1
Price, Alan C.     175849/84  (9.4%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH______________:
1
Craig, Christopher     71174/84  (3.8%) 
BBBBBBBBBBB____________________________:
1
Write-in 1     9947/84  (0.5%) 
A______________________________________:
1
Write-in 2     313/84  (0.0%) 
J______________________________________:
1
None of these     2    
L______________________________________
       
Results     
Write-in 2 Defeated  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
G L
 
       

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 7  Votes 
--------------------------------------- 2670 37/84 (14.3%)---------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     267536/84  (14.3%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :
47/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     270030/84  (14.4%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
70/84
McGovern, Marc C.     268347/84  (14.4%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
71/84
Lummis, Ben     269970/84  (14.4%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :
72/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     269115/84  (14.4%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :
82/84
Grassi, Joseph G.     267252/84  (14.3%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD :
1
Price, Alan C.     175849/84  (9.4%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH______________:
1
Craig, Christopher     71174/84  (3.8%) 
BBBBBBBBBB_____________________________:
1
Write-in 1     9947/84  (0.5%) 
AA_____________________________________:
1
None of these     5    
L______________________________________
       
Results     
Write-in 1 Defeated  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
B C D E F G H I L
 
       

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 8  Votes 
-------------------------------------- 2661 25/84 (14.3%)--------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     268458/84  (14.4%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :
47/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     270268/84  (14.5%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
70/84
McGovern, Marc C.     268777/84  (14.4%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
71/84
Lummis, Ben     270661/84  (14.5%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :F
72/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     269660/84  (14.5%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :
82/84
Grassi, Joseph G.     267313/84  (14.3%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD :D
1
Price, Alan C.     176243/84  (9.5%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH_____________:
1
Craig, Christopher     71440/84  (3.8%) 
BBBBBBBBBB____________________________:
1
None of these     69    
L_____________________________________
       
Results     
Craig, Christopher Defeated  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
CC D E FFF GG H I L
 
       

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 9  Votes 
-------------------------------------- 2650 13/84 (14.3%)--------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     274641/84  (14.8%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :I
47/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     277983/84  (15.0%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :C
70/84
McGovern, Marc C.     282665/84  (15.2%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :GG
71/84
Lummis, Ben     292649/84  (15.8%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :FFFF
72/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     273421/84  (14.7%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :EE
82/84
Grassi, Joseph G.     272525/84  (14.7%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD :D
1
Price, Alan C.     181152/84  (9.8%) 
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH____________:
1
None of these     147    
LL____________________________________
       
Results     
Price, Alan C. Defeated  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
CC D EEEEEEE FFFFF GGGG IIIII LL
 
       

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 10  Votes 
-------------------------------------------- 3070 42/84 (16.7%)--------------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     309370/84  (16.8%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :
47/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     293255/84  (15.9%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC__:
70/84
McGovern, Marc C.     307481/84  (16.7%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :
71/84
Lummis, Ben     329934/84  (17.9%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :FFFF
72/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     322242/84  (17.5%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :EE
82/84
Grassi, Joseph G.     279954/84  (15.2%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD____:
1
None of these     275    
LLLL________________________________________
       
Results     
Harding, Richard, Jr. Equalized  
Lummis, Ben Equalized  
McGovern, Marc C. Equalized  
Walser, Nancy Equalized  
Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized  
        
Transfers (to these colors):  
CC DD G I
 
Transfers (from these colors):  
EE FFF
 
       
Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots  
Harding, Richard, Jr. 152  65/84
82/84: 1935 37/84: 600 14/84: 191 13/84: 301 12/84: 286
 
Lummis, Ben 22876/84 56/84
72/84: 2595 37/84: 562 14/84: 116 13/84: 599 2/84: 275
 
McGovern, Marc C. 439/84 60/84
71/84: 2478 37/84: 404 19/84: 681 14/84: 170 8/84: 217
 
Walser, Nancy 2328/84 39/84
47/84: 3363 19/84: 413 14/84: 195 13/84: 441 8/84: 329
 
Fantini, Alfred B.    69/84
70/84: 2481 45/84: 415 28/84: 121 23/84: 217 18/84: 216
 

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Only winners remain, so the dotted line is raised to the Ideal Number.
Go to the next round































  
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Round 11  Votes 
-------------------------------------------- 3070 42/84 (16.7%)--------------------------------------------
Max
Walser, Nancy     310838/84  (16.9%) 
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :
39/84
Fantini, Alfred B.     308120/84  (16.7%) 
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC :
69/84
McGovern, Marc C.     309040/84  (16.8%) 
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :G
60/84
Lummis, Ben     309283/84  (16.8%) 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF :
56/84
Harding, Richard, Jr.     307269/84  (16.7%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :
65/84
Grassi, Joseph G.     29772/84  (16.2%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD__:
1
None of these     275    
LLLL________________________________________
       
Results       
Fantini, Alfred B.Elected  
Grassi, Joseph G.Elected  
Harding, Richard, Jr.Elected  
Lummis, BenElected  
McGovern, Marc C.Elected  
Walser, NancyElected  
       

No further maximum reductions are allowed, so the count is complete. All winners should be near the Ideal Number of votes. Usually most ballots count toward their highest-ranked winner. Some count for two winners, but rarely more than that. See the slice report. The depth report shows the contribution of lower choices to the result. The "none of these" pile is an accurate measure of unsatisfied voters.































 
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Ballot Depth: This shows how much the lower rankings on ballots contributed to the winning candidates.

Rank Fraction of votes for winners
1st 70.4% 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
2nd 22.2% 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
3rd 7.0% 
XXXXXX
4th 0.4% 
X






























   
DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2003 School Committee Election
(By DemoChoice rules)
6 candidates will be elected with 18698 ballots cast.

First Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page


Slices: This shows the distribution of how many winners a ballot counted for.

Slices Percentage of ballots with that many slices
30.2% 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
69.8% 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX