First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 1  Votes  1302 31/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1266    (24.3%)  1 Paul Richard HUDSON     948    (18.2%)  1 Michael GUEST     726    (13.9%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     660    (12.7%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     447    (8.6%)  1 Jo GALER     385    (7.4%)  1 Steve YOUNG     324    (6.2%)  1 Alan MCDONALD     197    (3.8%)  1 Calvin OATEN     142    (2.7%)  1 Paul John Michael MCMULLAN     115    (2.2%)  1           Results       Paul John Michael MCMULLAN Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 2  Votes  1298 1/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1313    (25.3%)  1 Paul Richard HUDSON     953    (18.4%)  1 Michael GUEST     735    (14.2%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     675    (13.0%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     449    (8.6%)  1 Jo GALER     391    (7.5%)  1 Steve YOUNG     332    (6.4%)  1 Alan MCDONALD     201    (3.9%)  1 Calvin OATEN     143    (2.8%)  1 None of these     18                Results       Teresa STEVENSON Elected               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Teresa STEVENSON 14 59/60 1 1: 1178

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

There is a newly elected candidate whose maximum could not be reduced. The surplus is lower than the number of ballots in the first histogram bin (the ballots counting the largest fraction toward the candidate) times the smallest fraction, so they cannot all transfer that fraction without exceeding the surplus.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 3  Votes  1298 1/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1313    (25.3%)  1 Paul Richard HUDSON     953    (18.4%)  1 Michael GUEST     735    (14.2%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     675    (13.0%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     449    (8.6%)  1 Jo GALER     391    (7.5%)  1 Steve YOUNG     332    (6.4%)  1 Alan MCDONALD     201    (3.9%)  1 Calvin OATEN     143    (2.8%)  1 None of these     18                Results       Calvin OATEN Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 4  Votes  1294 46/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1332    (25.7%)  1 Paul Richard HUDSON     963    (18.6%)  1 Michael GUEST     748    (14.4%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     710    (13.7%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     464    (9.0%)  1 Jo GALER     407    (7.9%)  1 Steve YOUNG     346    (6.7%)  1 Alan MCDONALD     209    (4.0%)  1 None of these     31                Results       Teresa STEVENSON Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Teresa STEVENSON 37 14/60 59/60 1: 1191

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 5  Votes  1294 46/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1312 9/60  (25.3%)  59/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     966 16/60  (18.7%)  1 Michael GUEST     750 44/60  (14.5%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     712 49/60  (13.8%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     467 20/60  (9.0%)  1 Jo GALER     410 22/60  (7.9%)  1 Steve YOUNG     348 36/60  (6.7%)  1 Alan MCDONALD     210 44/60  (4.1%)  1 None of these     31                Results       Alan MCDONALD Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 6  Votes  1286 31/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1345 54/60  (26.2%)  59/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     995 40/60  (19.3%)  1 Michael GUEST     775 3/60  (15.1%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     747 15/60  (14.5%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     484 36/60  (9.4%)  1 Jo GALER     426 40/60  (8.3%)  1 Steve YOUNG     370 52/60  (7.2%)  1 None of these     64                Results       Teresa STEVENSON Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Teresa STEVENSON 59 23/60 57/60 59/60: 1206

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 7  Votes  1286 31/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1305 42/60  (25.4%)  57/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1003    (19.5%)  1 Michael GUEST     781 9/60  (15.2%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     753 45/60  (14.6%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     491 48/60  (9.6%)  1 Jo GALER     434    (8.4%)  1 Steve YOUNG     376 36/60  (7.3%)  1 None of these     64                Results       Steve YOUNG Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 8  Votes  1278 46/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1385 18/60  (27.1%)  57/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1065 27/60  (20.8%)  1 Michael GUEST     838 6/60  (16.4%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     811 54/60  (15.9%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     532 18/60  (10.4%)  1 Jo GALER     481 57/60  (9.4%)  1 None of these     95                Results       Teresa STEVENSON Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Teresa STEVENSON 106 32/60 52/60 57/60: 1214

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 9  Votes  1278 46/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1284 8/60  (25.1%)  52/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1086 12/60  (21.2%)  1 Michael GUEST     856 36/60  (16.7%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     831 44/60  (16.3%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     552 48/60  (10.8%)  1 Jo GALER     503 32/60  (9.8%)  1 None of these     95                Results       Jo GALER Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 10  Votes  1267 16/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1392 12/60  (27.5%)  52/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1145 36/60  (22.6%)  1 Michael GUEST     932 40/60  (18.4%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     911 12/60  (18.0%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     687 20/60  (13.6%)  1 None of these     141                Results       Teresa STEVENSON Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Teresa STEVENSON 124 56/60 46/60 52/60: 1221

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 11  Votes  1267 16/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1270 6/60  (25.1%)  46/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1175 18/60  (23.2%)  1 Michael GUEST     960 10/60  (18.9%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     940 36/60  (18.6%)  1 Nicola HOLMAN     722 50/60  (14.3%)  1 None of these     141                Results       Nicola HOLMAN Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 12  Votes  1236 31/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1484 26/60  (30.0%)  46/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1298 38/60  (26.3%)  1 Michael GUEST     1119 18/60  (22.6%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     1043 38/60  (21.1%)  1 None of these     264                Results       Paul Richard HUDSON Elected     Teresa STEVENSON Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Paul Richard HUDSON 62 7/60 51/60 1: 923 14/60: 169   Teresa STEVENSON 247 55/60 32/60 46/60: 1121

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 13  Votes  1236 31/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1283 1/60  (25.9%)  32/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1245 49/60  (25.2%)  51/60 Michael GUEST     1251 27/60  (25.3%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     1165 43/60  (23.6%)  1 None of these     264                Results       Michael GUEST Elected               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Michael GUEST 14 56/60 1 1: 775 28/60: 190 9/60: 132

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

There is a newly elected candidate whose maximum could not be reduced. The surplus is lower than the number of ballots in the first histogram bin (the ballots counting the largest fraction toward the candidate) times the smallest fraction, so they cannot all transfer that fraction without exceeding the surplus.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 14  Votes  1236 31/60 (25%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1283 1/60  (25.9%)  32/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1245 49/60  (25.2%)  51/60 Michael GUEST     1251 27/60  (25.3%)  1 Douglas Wayne HALL     1165 43/60  (23.6%)  1 None of these     264                Results       Douglas Wayne HALL Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 15  Votes  1552 (33.3%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1637 37/60  (35.2%)  32/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1529 34/60  (32.9%)  51/60 Michael GUEST     1488 49/60  (32.0%)  1 None of these     554                Results       Teresa STEVENSON Equalized     Paul Richard HUDSON Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Teresa STEVENSON 85 37/60 27/60 32/60: 986 9/60: 158   Paul Richard HUDSON     50/60 51/60: 890 33/60: 156

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Only winners remain, so the dotted line is raised to the Ideal Number.
Go to the next round

First Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 16  Votes  1552 (33.3%) Max Teresa STEVENSON     1564 12/60  (33.6%)  27/60 Paul Richard HUDSON     1554 34/60  (33.4%)  50/60 Michael GUEST     1537 14/60  (33.0%)  1 None of these     554                Results         Michael GUEST Elected     Paul Richard HUDSON Elected     Teresa STEVENSON Elected

No further maximum reductions are allowed, so the count is complete. All winners should be near the Ideal Number of votes. Usually most ballots count toward their highest-ranked winner. Some count for two winners, but rarely more than that. See the slice report. The depth report shows the contribution of lower choices to the result. The "none of these" pile is an accurate measure of unsatisfied voters.

First Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Rank	Fraction of votes for winners
1st	52.3%
2nd	25.9%
3rd	14.7%
4th	3.7%
5th	1.9%
6th	0.9%
7th	0.3%

First Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Slices	Percentage of ballots with that many slices
1	59.7%
2	40.3%